Saturday 18 November 2017

The Blooming Flowers in A Handful of Dust by Ubaji Isiaka Abubakar Eazy

The Blooming Flowers in A Handful of Dust

Well, let us just say that I am fortunate to have a rucksack containing various species of blooming flowers and I must say that it was an enjoyable experience putting these flowers under close observation.

My rucksack is a collection of short stories from the 2013 Farafina Trust Creative Writing Workshop titled A Handful of Dust. The book has a collection of fine stories from budding writers, amongst whom the next great literary light from Africa will emerge. Let us examine the tales in this book.

Suleiman Agbonkhianmen Buhari's "My Family Tree: My Family's Journey through Time and Geopolitics" could not be called a story as such for it spans several generations and the writer deceives us to make us think the story is about his family tree, it is in fact the story of a society being continuously visited by change orchestrated by external forces. Such a tale would have been loftier had it been written in the form of a traditional narrative poem. It would have sounded smooth on the lips of a traditional praise singer for it has the "stuff" of which great tales are made. The adaptation of the traditional story teller style for telling a story by subconsciously fixing himself in the past as well as the present and a direct translation of thought from the traditional Edo language into English sustains the readers' interest. By exploring the significance of names (especially its semantic implications) in an African setting and employing it to introduce the birth of a new generation, Buhari tells us his tale in such a way that we find his story both endearing and fascinating.

Gbolahan Adeola's "Aderoye" might not be my favorite story but it is a satisfying and complete story which leaves very little (if any at all) of its knots untied, there is something about me and traditional Yoruba stories of warriors and kings, I just love them! Aderoye is that loyal warrior and patriotic prince of Ilujin whom his elder brother and king plots against to have banished to the fringes of the village for fear that Aderoye might harm him (the king). Every of Aderoye's family members are murdered in a gruesome manner except his only son (Dekunle) who is left alive with him. Yet when the king dies and a royal blood is needed for sacrificial purposes before the king can be buried, Aderoye's only surviving son is used to perform the ritual but wait, that is not all, you should know how Aderoye retaliated the wrongs visited upon him unjustly and that is what I shall not tell you (haha). There exists a close resemblance between this story and the myth of Ogun (the Yoruba god of iron). Like Aderoye, those Ogun trusted connived against him to have his family killed yet they would return to him years after to seek forgiveness and ask that he become their king, this was after he had left the town in annoyance and placed curses upon it. However, the Ogun myth preached forgiveness as against Aderoye which ended in revenge. As in the short story told by Gbolahan Adeola in this book, the theme of betrayal is also poignant in the mythic presentation of Ogun's story. We should not fail to note the use of the second person personal pronoun in the story which of course makes us to empathize with Aderoye's plight in the hands of the Ilujin royalty.

In Uchenna Walter Ude's "Any Last Words" do we find a schizophrenic protagonist led towards murder by an uncontrollable jealously. It is strange that a man would kill another man for a woman he never once wooed and even more strange that the same man would go on to kill that woman, such a man must be dancing in the realm of abnormality. The story lacks verisimilitude to me. Perhaps, the writer should have worked more on having an actual love proposal or affair before edging the protagonist towards murders. I noticed the use of two voices in the narration, that of the protagonist in the first person and that of an omniscience narrator. I think the combination is a bad choice, maybe Uchenna Walter Ude should have let the priest pick up the second voice rather than giving it to the narrator yet that would have amounted to having the voice of the protagonist in quotes. Herein do we see the inadequacy of the first person narrative point of view which does not let the writer go beyond what the narrator knows or witnesses. Uchenna Walter Ude's "Any Last Words?" is not a story I shall want to read again.

Kelechi Njoku "The Third Silence" captures a child (Abby Sam) growing up to understand that all is not well in her home, especially between her parents; there is too much silence but the third silence signifies the separation of her parents with her mother having to leave the house after the father caught her mother with her lover. Not as interesting as that of Buhari and Adeola but a good story nonetheless.

"A Handful of Dust" is the second story that I have read written by Arinze Ifekandu, the first is "God's Children are Little Broken Things". And like the first, "A Handful of Dust" tackles societal acceptance cum reaction to homosexuals. Though I have my reservations on "God's Children are Little Broken Things", I agree that it is a great story and the Ifekandu took time to give that story flesh and blood. I am afraid the same cannot be said of "A Handful of Dust", the narrator is far older than the voice ascribed to him, I expected to see a young boy of ten to twelve years in that story, not a young adult already in the university. The inquisitiveness, use of rhetorical question, choice of the simple sentence style and manner of narration simply does not match the narrator's age bracket. But I understand why the writer raised the age bracket, it is perhaps a question of portraying a ten year old child as having a girlfriend. This is a problem that can be solved if you steer the story towards another direction by not making girlfriends the basis for comparison or just write that the ten year old child was caught having a sexual fling with a girl in the church, kids "innocently" do this you know (winks)? Moreover, if the narrator is over 18 as the writer wants us to see him, I do not think the mother would be having another child 18 years in-between the last one, it is not an impossibility, but a rare one which should even be discussed in the story if thought so. 

Maybe there is also that issue of the suicide, do you not think so too, Ifekandu? That suicide is unjustified. Do you think it is the dad's warning Lottana to stop calling Kamsi which initiated the suicide move or is it the discovery that Kamsi is a homosexual which precipitated the move to give up on life? From what I read in the story, the latter seems to be the case more than the first. The father's reaction is just not harsh enough for Kamsi to have committed suicide. Perhaps, you might consider giving that aspect more flesh.

However, I like the way the writer is able to interrogate the mind and expose the words in it, perfect for the way the mind of a child runs. Also the image of "dust" keeps appearing so that it becomes a sort of leit-motif and a symbol of the agony of death present in Kamsi's household following his demise and contrasting deeply with the birth of a new child in the same household.

Kiprop Kimutai's "Evening Tea with the Dead" is hinged on the theme of a fleeting existence; the journey from childhood towards old age--a journey towards death. It is a lonesome journey even with friends and family around us but what if our fate is as that of Kogo, the female protagonist in the story? Kogo grows old and watches people around her die one after the other, without a child of her own to take care of her, she refuses to go stay with the family of her step children. She remembers her youth. Kogo is a perfect representation of the frustration of life and her story captures the metamorphosing stages of life. 

Timedu Aghahowa's "Origin" has a narrator who comes from a lineage of story tellers and the mother is insistent on passing this tradition to her daughter despite the fact that the daughter is of a modern age that had witnessed much technological and scientific advancement. One of the striking story her mother tells her is that of a wicked old woman whose spirit is refused entry into the village after death.

Timedu Aghahowa and Kiprop Kimutai stories showcase a peculiar aspect of the African culture which believes in a constant communion with the dead. Our dead do not die and go to heaven or hell, they die physically and their spirit remains roving around our homesteads and hamlets. We even prepare and keep food for them awaiting their nightly visits. Both stories are in the realm of magical realism in African literature, an ideology whose force would be strongly felt in the next story.

"Pink Soap" by Abdulrashid Mohammed has its creed in magical realism and it is perhaps my favourite of all stories in the collection, very scary and real! It is the story of Jonke who joined a secret ritual cult for the purpose of obtaining wealth. The story begins with Jonke's death and a flashback depicting his initiation ceremony. Jonke is dead and against the wishes of his wife, his body must go to the secret cult he belongs to. He must be punished for not presenting one of his son to take his place in the cult, his body would be grinded and turned into a pink soap! A pink soap always kept to be used to bathe new initiates. How this process is achieved will leave you visibly shaken, that is if you do manage to reach the end of the story. There is a great lesson to be learnt from the story too; the unjustified pursuit of wealth usually comes with dire consequences. Perhaps, Abdulrashid Mohammed's "Pink Soap" is the African form of horror story.

With Rapulu Charles Udo's "Oil for Bait," we  move to the realm of ecocriticism to visit the damage caused by the concerted effort of the government and the oil companies. It is the story of a young boy who comes to discover that his father is not a fisherman as he had always been led to believe, rather he is an oil thief. But what is there to aspire towards in a place where the greed for oil has left even nature destabilized.

"Popa is strong. He'll come back." I said.

"Not again. Na the way for all of Tham. Him nat alone."

"Grandpa was a fisherman. He didn't die at sea."

"Ya thank ya father a fisher?"

"I know him as a fisherman."

"Ya nat know him well. Ya father de steal petrol before he start wark for that refine..."

I kept quiet.

"Ya no know? He dey oil until that man came. E no wan ya Papa spoil his business na im make he put am for that refine."

"Why he came back with fish sometimes?"

"To cover...to say a ma fisher. Mi know him well. But ya no go be fisher as I live."

She looked into my eyes. "Ya no go be fisher as I live, pickin. Na the story for those wey steal petrol. Tham go. Tham no dey retarn." (104)

The choice of pidgin in dialogue gives to the story a local colour and verisimilitude although the choice of polished English for the boy character is not a good choice even if the intention is to show that the boy is partially educated.

Rapulu Charles Udoh tells a sad tale but not a delightful one.

Damilola Yakubu's "I Killed You" engages the "self" in a conversation. It is an explication of how we, humans, live our life as one person today and become another person tomorrow. As we grow, life (its challenges and experiences) affects and changes us so that we might look back to see the man we once were and not recognize that man again, that former man becomes a stranger to a new you.

Perhaps, the unique thing about this story is the use of two voices; the first and second person pronoun to represent two voices from one narrator; the first person pronoun represents the narrator in the present while the second person pronoun (you) represents the narrator in the past. So with this, you would understand how it becomes possible for "I" to have killed "you".

For young Idi, the protagonist, the avoidable death of Ebun through an avoidable road accident (if only the governor had thought it wise to install road bumps on the newly constructed road that went by the school to slow down vehicles) meant the death of his young self. Ebun was the only one with whom he found acceptance and innocent child love in, her demise translated into him never being himself again and this is how "I" killed "you".

The story Adaora Nwankwo tells us in "Little Things" is that of a society infested with too much corruption and decay. A society where lecturers collect bribes before awarding pass marks to students or force their students to buy irrelevant materials and handouts. A world where civil servants think it irrelevant to resume at their offices and perform their duties, where you have to bribe government hospital workers before they attend to you. It is always a case of giving something to get something.

But amidst all these are people who are prepared to keep their head while all others are losing theirs, people like Nnenna who would neither collect bribe from her students nor give bribe to corrupt lab attendants in the government hospital where her husband is admitted. She is also the caring type who would never stop thinking about the plight of others. They are also people like the doctor who would sweat it out (despite the challenges posed by the refusal of the government to make available necessary hospital equipments) to snatch human lives from the very jaws of death!

These people, although quite few and rare, are the treasures of the society and give to the insanity of our existence a semblance of sanity.

Maryam Isa has a great story but left it unfinished, her story left me feeling dissatisfied and like Oliver, I was itching to get more. "Incense" is a comment on the culture of forced child marriage in northern Nigeria and depicts the experience of the first bridal night between Kwaise, a young inexperienced lady betrothed to a more matured and experienced Abdul Mu'umin. The burning incense serves a symbolic purpose for it captures Kwaise's innocence and beauty, and at the end the incense is spilled on that which Kwaise loves most about her new home, the Persian rug. It burns it; clearly a symbol of the pain and destruction caused by the sexual contact between the newly married couple. The rug becomes her innocence and virginity burnt my Abdul Mu'umin insistence to defile her against her wish.

"A Night of Regrets" by Sifa Asani Gowon is actually ironical if we consider the conflicts that would have evolved had the narrator engaged in the act he is regretting. It centers on the issue of infidelity among married couples as well as making the right choices in life. I love how the writer developed the story and employed suspense to engage the reader. Next to Abdulrashid Mohammed's "Pink Soap", it is my next favourite story.

You do not know what you have until you lose it, this is the lesson to be learnt from Efe Paul Azino's "Dying Alone". When a man quarrels and make enemies of those who should stand by him when he is falling, he ends up living a solitary life till death comes knocking. Alongside this is also the issue of arranged marriage by parents who think it to be the only way to cement their friendship. The tale is told in a series of flashbacks giving vivid images of domestic violence and that is perhaps its most potent technique.

One thing I find out is that in Africa, we always seek spiritual rather than medical help to resolve our problems and that is what I come to encounter in Okechukwu Otukwu's "Fighting Temptations". The story is that of a man struggling against the rising urge to become a paedophile. He runs to the priest to confess his impure thoughts and narrates how he almost committed the act itself, this was after he had tried curing himself via seeking spiritual assistance elsewhere to no avail. I think these priests once confronted with such challenges must make it a point of duty to advise the penitent to seek medical assistance while they support him with prayers. However, the most important thing about the story is that it helps us to examine the disturbing issue of pedophilia from the perspective of the supposed villain, it helps us to know that some of those who commit the abominable act are not pushed by the urge to have sex only but might be mentally unstable, a condition that also needs to be further investigated by science. The story employs the same monologue style as Uchenna Walter Ude "Any Last Words" in its narration.

Lilian Izuorah "Pickled Peppers" offers to us the archetypal tussle between the mother in law and the wife. Here it is not just an issue of physical quarrel but also of spiritual attack which will lead to a family keeping its distance from the mother in law so that even when she dies, the grandchildren know not of her good sides since she spread the war declared upon the mother to the kids also.

Faith Tissa tells a terrifying story in "Siege" about a young man (Kewe) who has series of midnight imaginative attacks. Strange enough, Kewe is always quiet and calm during the day so Tina could not have known about this abnormality before renting an apartment in the same flat as Kewe. The story captures the challenges faced by Lagosians seeking an abode to dwell. Lagos is a place where you come in contact with the good, the bad and the ugly. The trouble of getting a reasonable and calm atmosphere to dwell in is almost a miracle for those who are not too rich, it is either the landlord or his wife are quarrelsome trouble makers or the next door neighbour is always beating  his wife. With Lagos, there is always a palaver waiting in ambush for you and there are neighbours who are so clever at minding their businesses that they care little if you are sinking into the ground or even dying! 

"Lagos to Servile: A Schengen Visa" by Tajudeen Kojeyo is hinged on the issue of infidelity and the embarrassment of Nigerians travelling abroad as a result of past history of drug crime and illegal immigration. Great thematic content but not my idea of a good story.

Lastly, we have Adanna Adeleke's "On Finding Home" with the main character no longer feeling at ease in her home after a painful rape experience and the death of her mother. In her bid to escape these tribulations she runs from home to London in search of peace but there she meets with racism and societal castigation. At the end, she makes a U-turn journeying towards home to find peace at long last in the embrace of her father arms.

The good thing about Adanna Adeleke's "On Finding Home" and Tajudeen Kojeyo's "Lagos to Seville" is that both show a sharp departure from the story of migration or travelling abroad that we have come to be used to especially Chimamanda Ngozi Adichie's Americanah and Ike Oguine's A Squater's Tale. In both of these tales, the need to travel outside the country is spurred by the total loss of fate in the workability of the system of things in the country, characters are disillusioned and with no hope of better days ahead, they seek an escape route outside the shores and borders of Nigeria and it matters little what had to be done to get there or what jobs are available at the place they run to, they just want to "check out!"But with Adanna Adeleke and Tajudeen Kojeyo, we see that Nigerians also travel not to do drugs, engage in prostitution, or become second class citizens in another man's country but to seek inner peace or for brief vacation.

On a general note, I see Chimamanda Ngozi Adichie's influence on these writers, most were influenced by her style of narration (especially in the choice of the second person pronoun for narration) but they forget what makes Adichie thick. Adichie is a combination of two great African writers. While her style of narration is obviously influenced by Chinua Achebe, she also has the uncanny ability to make her readers sympathize or empathize with her characters (like Buchi Emecheta), with Adichie, you can develop deep seethed hatred for a character that you might find yourself wanting to reach into the book to strangle that character to death, yet will you find that character who you would fall in love with and, like Pygmalion, wish that the character become real. Almost all of the blooming flowers in this anthology miss this aspect of Adichie; except perhaps Gbolahan Adeola who has a most moving tale.

With these blooming flowers, we see a variety of experimental writings ("I Killed You" for example), we meet stories spanning various epochs and travel with the writers as they take us from one place to another. We are confronted with issues ranging from self determination, betrayal, homosexuality, domestic violence, the search for inner peace and more. With them we also ventured into the realm of history, myth, ecocriticism and magical realism.

It would be wrong to expect these young writers (blooming flowers) to be near perfection, in fact, they are the definition of imperfection! But with them, I see hope for the future of African literature. The best is yet to come! Adichie and her team deserve our applause for gathering such great minds to weave for us beautiful tales that leave us hungry for more.

© Ubaji Isiaka Abubakar Eazy 2017

Meet the Reviewer

Ubaji Isiaka Abubakar Eazy is a literary critic, book reviewer , copy editor, poet, and essayist.

Sunday 5 November 2017

FBO Akporobaro's The Lament of the Town Crier: The True Calling of the African Poet by Ubaji Isiaka Abubakar Eazy

FBO Akporobaro's The Lament of the Town Crier: The True Calling of the African Poet

FBO Akporobaro's The Lament of the Town Crier is a great collection of poems. Its greatness lies in the fact that it addresses pertinent issues that have become anathemas to almost all African countries. These issues include dictatorship, military rule, oppression, corruption, bad governance, and cannibalism. FBO Akporobaro has demonstrated that above all, the poet must show commitment to society, he must take side with the oppressed and seek liberation from the oppressors. He is the town crier crying for a revolution, asking that the status quo be changed. To achieve this, Akporobaro employs a simple diction that can be understood by the lay man on the street, the poet knows his audience and he is desperate to reach out to them. He goes as far as even employing the pidgin as the medium for committing some of his poems to paper.

Using a fictional name (Ekindu) for his country, Nigeria, the poet goes on to discuss the ills in the society. However, the issues he points out are not peculiar to the Nigerian society alone as Nigeria is a microcosm of the most African societies. The poet would even go as far as leaving the boundaries of Nigeria to examine these same issues in other African countries.

"Victims", for instance, captures the a helpless woman made a widow by the military president. Via the use of dialogue, we see insensitivity on the side of the soldiers who make of an object of ridicule:

"Why are you crying
Who are you seeking
Amongst the dead?"
The soldiers asked laughing.

The woman moaned feebly.
"The President has killed my husband
And eaten his heart
Along with the eyes of justice." (8)

This poem is most likely composed during General Ibrahim Babangida's reign of terror as a self styled military president of Nigeria. During this epoch, there was the brutalisation of many citizens and denial of basic human rights, the most painful being the death of Dele Giwa through a letter bomb, the poet addresses this in another poem titled "The African General". The hardship and struggle for survival in fictional Ekindu, occasioned by satanic leaders, would lead to cannibalism as men begin to sell human parts as meat as seen in "Under Arrest", it would lead to parents wishing the death of their children as in "I have to Kill you my Child", and cause professors to become frustrated with the classroom.

The poet believes that African biggest headache are its set of leaders who are corrupt, vain, insensitive and would rather live extravagant and immoral life even though there are confronted with the poverty, hunger, and helplessness of the people they are supposed to lead!

"So we who preside as Afric presidents
We go fucking, giggling, 
In our pink gums and black rotund cheeks
Terrorizing, killing, embezzling and fucking about
For these are the easiest
Things for us to do
In this land of primordial drought." (36)

The poet also warns, using historical allusion of Egyptian pharaohs cum dictators (Ramses and Ozymandias) to prove that all political power and material wealth is vain and would soon loose their essence after mortality takes its toll on us all.

Ramseses! Ramseses, rise out of your mountains
And with Ozymandias and Orok
Answer, reason, and resolve with Time
What it would matter one million years
From now that I built this mansion at Ibadan

        This house at Ikoyi
        This mansion at Abuja
        This house at Emede
        This mansion at G. R. A. (18)

For the poet, the ungodly and irresponsible acts of African leaders explains why some have lost faith in the existence of God. This idea is buried in the heart of his poem "Argument with God" and in "The Child and the Ghost of Hunger".

Least I forget, the collection also hosts some long narrative poems which include the poem that gave its title to the book: "The Lament of the Town Crier: An Elegy on MKO Abiola" which actually details the life and death of a great Yoruba political leader whose presidential mandate was stolen by a military despot whose wish it is to keep perpetrating himself in power. There is also "The Virgin Priestess and the Anthill" which adopts a Chaucerian style to tell a story, the poem should be considered an epic and it continues with "The Child and the Ghost of Hunger" (1 and 2), the first captures the horrible fate that awaits those who dare to say the truth in a land where truth is suppressed and fear enthroned while the second and third uses a child interaction with the "Ghost of Hunger" to prove that hunger, death, and famine are caused by the recklessness and irresponsibility of African leaders mismanaging the wealth of a great nation that should be enough for all to live well. 

Akporobaro has done a great job in the choice of selecting thematic troupes to brood upon but is there strength in his poetry? I find that his style of poetry is bland as his diction is not of the elevated kind associated with poetry and what I mean here has nothing to do with the simplicity of the poem and how open they are to interpretation, I speak of the use of images (there are cases of historical and mythical allusion though) avoiding redundancy, and dislocation of language. While I appreciate the fact that he makes it a duty to communicate with his target audience in a manner that can be easily grasped by them (the lay man on the street), even to the extent of using the pidgin in some instances, he never should have sacrificed simplicity for art, he must strike a balance! He must learn to be simple without being simplistic like Osundare. Still on diction, it is important to note that Akporobaro is a great scholar of the oral tradition and it is evident that his style of writing must have benefitted from the simple style of the oral medium. Yet, I expected that he should not have stopped at just employing the simple rendition approached, he should also have tried his hands on proverbs, folktales, and employed refrain (all which are strong elements of orality) in his poetry.

I am not happy with the last poem, the one he wrote in prose and labelled prose poems, he should let prose be prose and let poetry run as poetry. If the poet is so interested in explaining his atheist stance, it can still be done in verse instead of producing prose and shuffling it down our throats as poetry.

Also, the idea of polluting the section meant for long narrative poems with short ones is also not agreeable as it spoils the arrangement of poems in the book. Poems such as "The Prostitute", "The Praying Mantis", and "Bishop of Urhobo" belong in the first section rather than appearing in the second. Even the poem "The Lament of a Town Crier" has no place in the second section for it is not a "narrative" poem.

Lastly, the epic poem in three different parts (which Udu Yakubu incorrectly describes as "folktale poetry" in the introduction to the collection) have their perfection tainted by the injection of prose into it, especially those letters of Abdullahi's to God and his ancestors. There are sour parts of an otherwise beautiful poem. This kind of admixture of prose and verse in an epic poem; according to Isidore Okpewho; is  the type that makes eurocentric scholars of African orality derogatorily label the African epic as "saga" which of course is laughable! Nonetheless, the risk of having such an admixture might be read as a weakness in creating verse in some quarters, this we cannot allow.

In conclusion, we must applaud Akporobaro for tipping the scale in favour of justice as against oppression, choosing to speak the truth in a society where fear of the political juggernauts have become the order of the day, enlightening the masses on the source of the many ills in the African society (showing where the rain began beating us) and recognizing that the true calling of the African poet is to serve as the vanguard of the people, to be a gadfly in the realm of political predators and scavengers. Despite the formal blemishes, Akporobaro deserves our commendation still.

© Ubaji Isiaka Abubakar Eazy 2017

Meet the Reviewer

Ubaji Isiaka Abubakar Eazy is a poet, short story writer, copy editor and essayist. He is the Chief Editor at literarycriticsandwriters.simdif.com

Saturday 28 October 2017

Ola Rotimi's Ovonramwen Nogbaisi: When History Becomes Drama by Ubaji Isiaka Abubakar Eazy

Ola Rotimi's Ovonramwen Nogbaisi: When History Becomes Drama


OBARUDUAGBON. Today is your day: tomorrow belongs to another!

ESASOYEN. Indeed: the Whiteman who is stronger than you will soon come! (Ola Rotimi 6)

The above reminds me of the words of a great Zulu Chief (Chaka) to his assailants. The difference this time is that the setting is the ancient Benin Empire and the words are not coming from a dying king but from subordinates who have just been sentenced to death by their Oba for murdering his trusted adviser. Nonetheless, it is a great inciting action for Ola Rotimi's eponymous play, Ovonramwen Nogbaisi.

You might not like Ola Rotimi's other plays, but Ovonramwen Nogbaisi is a play I am sure you cannot help loving. Aside Kurunmi (another historical drama by Ola Rotimi), this play is for me the best from the playwright. Ovonramwen Nogbaisi is a play that further establishes Rotimi's talent as a great African dramatist. His ability to rework history and breathe life into it on stage leaves me with nothing but admiration.

It is ancient Benin Empire and the ruler is Ovonramwen Nogbaisi, a young king who does not wish to be taken for granted by his subject considering his young age, he pronounces death upon the first set of rebel chiefs arrested in his kingdom to serve as a deterrent to others who might be thinking of toeing the same path of rebellion. The still defiant chiefs prophesy the conquest of the kingdom and the coming of the white man who would effect it. Against pleas by both the chiefs and the palace jester, Ovonramwen insists that his decision would not be rescinded.

There are troubles within the empire as little towns under Ovonramwen's kingdom are beginning to show signs of revolting yet Ovonramwen quashes these troubles to keep the kingdom a united entity. Since Ovonramwen succeeds in repressing internal rebellion, would he succeed in suppressing the aggression from external forces?

As prophesied by Esasoyen, the Whiteman came; with the intention to trade in rubber; but Ovonramwen is not impressed by the Whiteman's antics, was it not them who went about fixing a different price for oil after the Oba had chosen a certain price for the same commodity? How could the Whitemen call themselves his friends when they went about encouraging his people to rebel against his authority by selling commodities for different prices? This settled the issue for Ovonramwen and he refused to sign the trade treaty, neither would he accept the gifts of the Whiteman whose love only shows on the face but not in the heart.

Despite Ovonramwen rejection of the trade treaty, the White man's greed for the untapped resources in the Benin Empire would not let him turn his back to it as he makes another attempt to see the king but he has come at a wrong time; it is Ague ceremony and culture and tradition forbids strangers or visitors from making an incursion into Benin throughout the period of this ceremony and neither is the king allowed to see nor entertain visitors. The insistence of the group led by the Whitemen to make an incursion into Benin despite the refusal of the Benin police would lead to the group being attacked and killed by the warriors of Benin who take away the heads of the Whitemen as part of the spoils of war.

There is a reprisal attack from the British authority and it is terrible, with it came the fall of the Benin Empire and the takeover of the Benin Empire by the European authorities in the land. Oba Ovonramwen was arrested after attempting an escape and whisked away to Calabar, the colonial headquarters.

The play is a historical presentation of the fall of a great king, it describes a clash of interest between two opposing forces (the Benin Empire and the British Authority cum colonialist), it also shows the disregard and disrespect shown by the British authorities for the African cultural norms and traditions, and it reminds us of how African artifacts now deposited in European museums were looted or (to use the right word) stolen at the behest of an insensitive and greed inspired conquest.

Ovonramwen Nogbaisi was forced off his throne and land (an abomination!) , so was Jaja of Opobo, and so Nana of Ijekiri, all kings who refused an unjust trade system introduced by British authorities. In Ola Rotimi's Ovonramwen Nogbaisi, we are reminded of these great men who stood up and said "nay" when fear made all others say "ye".

The play is replete with the rich use of various Nigerian languages, such as the Benin language, Yoruba, and Hausa language, aside from the English language human used in producing the play--Ola Rotimi's love for various Nigerian languages is obvious, being from a mixed race himself (Yoruba and Benin), we see a better incorporation of various languages in another of his play, Hopes of the Living Dead. Also, the ornamentation of dialogues and speeches with myriad proverbs leaves one marvelling at the depth of the writer's knowledge of the oral repertoire, along with the various songs, they make the play a beautiful piece!

"Ikpema! Oba gha to o kpere!"

Rest on Ovonramwen Nogbaisi, the home leopard, rest great king!

© Ubaji Isiaka Abubakar Eazy 2017

Sunday 17 September 2017

The First (Igbo) Coup d'etat in Nigeria--A. M. Mainasara's The Five Majors - Why They Struck is Mere Ethnic Propaganda by Ubaji Isiaka Abubakar Eazy

The First (Igbo) Coup d'etat in Nigeria--A. M. Mainasara's The Five Majors - Why They Struck is Mere Ethnic Propaganda

--Ubaji Isiaka Abubakar Eazy


I read Adewale Ademoyega's Why We Struck a long time before now and found it an interesting and informative account (from an insider and an active participant in the coup) of the events that necessitated the first coup d'etat which took place in Nigeria. But when I came across A. M. Mainasara's refutation; The Five Majors-Why They Struck; I found myself scuttling back to Adewale Ademoyega's Why We Struck to ascertain the validity of A. M. Mainasara's facts, or perhaps opinions.

To A. M. Mainasara, the first set of coup plotters in Nigeria had no honourable , noble, or patriotic intentions. Rather, their concern was to wrest political power from the north which they assumed had become some sort of threat to the political existence of Nigeria. Let us hear him:


Redemption of the country was not their aim. Their purpose was to prevent a section of the country, the North, from effective participation in the governance of the country. This was to be accomplished through the physical elimination of the entire political and military elite of the North, beginning with the top leadership; the Sardauna of Sokoto, Premier of the Northern Region of Nigeria, the embodiment of the soul of the North and all that it stood for. The final solution of the so called Northern menace was to be effected after the conspirators had seized control of the government of the Federation. (A. M. Mainasara 9-10)


It is highly disturbing that some educated Nigerians prefer to distort history for the sake of ethnic propaganda. It is this kind of Mainasara's form of distorted history that is responsible for giving young Nigerians wrong notions of what transpired in the country's political past. An example is contained in the letter recently addressed to the acting president of Nigeria, Professor Yemi Osinbajo by the Arewa Youths Forum which in part states that:


“Our doubts are informed by the following historical antecedents that have characterized the behavior and conduct of the Igbo in Nigeria and previous efforts at containing them.

“The Igbo of Eastern Nigeria manifested their hatred for Nigeria’s unity barely five years after we gained our independence from the British when on January 15, 1966, their army officers carried out the first-ever mutiny that marked the beginning of a series of crisis which has profoundly altered the course of Nigeria’s history.

“By that ill motivated cowardly and deliberate action, the Igbo killed many northern officers from the rank of lieutenant colonel upwards and also decapitated the Prime Minister and the political leadership of the Northern and Western regions but left the zenith of Igbo leadership at the Federal level and the Eastern region intact.

“In line with the Igbo plan, General Aguiyi-Ironsi took advantage of the vacuum and, instead of returning power to the remnants of the First Republic government, he appropriated the coup and attempted to consolidate it for his people.

“Army officers of the Northern Region were eventually compelled to execute a counter coup on July 29, 1966 following a coordinated series of brazen provocations from the Igbo who taunting northerners on northern streets by mocking the way leaders of the region were slain by the Igbo. This unfortunately resulted in mob action which resulted in the death of many Igbos.

“And when Lt. Col. Yakubu Gowon, from the North took over as Head of State following the counter coup, the Igbo through Lt. Col. Ojukwu, characteristically refused to recognize Gowon. Ojukwu declared the secession of the Igbo people from Nigeria and the formation of the republic of Biafra on May 30, 1967 resulting in a civil war that led to the tragic deaths of more than 2 million Nigerians”. (Culled from https://www.vanguardngr.com/2017/06/northern-youths-write-osinbajo-beg-allow-igbo-go-biafra/)


See, young people are getting things wrong! To the northern Nigeria educated youth, the first Nigerian coup had to be about Igbo officers killing the political leaders of the North, yet it is more than that. This kind of misconception is invented because some writers; such as A. M. Mainasara; choose to underscore facts or tell half truths for their words are biased and reek of ethnic bigotry. Their facts are meant only for the dim witted and those who fail to evaluate events from various angles by getting hold of available historical documents.

A. M. Mainasara's view of history is slanted and should be regarded as nothing more than mere ethnic propaganda. He had set out to refute the claims of Adewale Ademoyega and Ben Gbuile in their written accounts (Why We Struck and The Five Majors respectively) of the first Nigerian coup d'etat and their roles as active conspirators and participants but had unknowingly  proven their facts to be  correct as a result of his slanted diction and approach to issues.

Maybe A. M. Mainasara does not know, but Major Chukwuma Kaduna Nzeogwu had more of the Hausa traits in him than being an Igbo man. He was born and brought up in the North, even bore the name "Kaduna" in addition to his Igbo names, he regarded himself first as  Nigerian before identifying with any tribe, religion, or region. Here is what Adewale Ademoyega has to say about Nzeogwu in his book:


Living with Nzeogwu gave me a deep insight into his character. He was the son of a civil servant. His parents hailed from Asaba in the Mid West (now Bendel), but he was born in Kaduna, schooled there and grew up there. He spoke HAUSA very fluently and he understood and HAD MANY HAUSA TRAITS.

I knew him to be extremely straightforward, open hearted and open handed. He spoke freely, hiding nothing. He gave generously. He was a good Christian (Roman Catholic), and attended Mass regularly. Unlike most single officers, he did not go around with girl friends. This surprised me, for, although we both agreed that there was no question of getting married before the revolution, I did not subscribe to total abstinence.

Nzeogwu was a good leader of men. The same could not be said of 90% of the officers. He drew the younger officers irresistibly to himself, endeavoring always to awaken in them both political and revolutionary consciousness and above all, patriotism. He spoke amusingly and all the young officers that had passes through his hands in the NMTC cherished him and held him in high esteem. Throughout 1965 Nzeogwu spoke freely and openly to some young officers about his intention to stage a revolution which would bring Nigeria to the path of greatness. All the young officers loved the idea and came closer to him. But the same could not be said of the middle level and senior officers, that is, Majors, Colonels, Brigaders and above. [Assented words are mine] (Adewale Ademoyega 68-69)


Judging by the words of Adewale Ademoyega, it is obvious that Nzeogwu had lofty ideas and was a detribalised Nigerian, unfortunately the same could not be said of A. M. Mainasara!

Nzeogwu was respected by his colleagues in the army including junior and senior officers that even when he died fighting on the side of Biafran forces during the Civil War, he was given and honorable burial benefiting a hero by the Federal Army. Nzeogwu died, not as a Biafran but, as a Nigerian.


We kept up our correspondence until the outbreak of the war on July 6, 1967. Three weeks later, I heard it over the NBC that Nzeogwu had been killed in the Nsukka sector of the war. I was utterly chagrined. Hours later, Biafra denied the report over their own radio. Later on, the Federal side confirmed the report and claimed that he was given "a hero's burial with full military honours". Pictures of him were displayed in the papers. Gowon also paid tribute to him saying "he was a gallant soldier, with principles." Many other Nigerians paid glowing tributes to his memory and everybody believed that he died a Nigerian, though fighting on the Biafran side. Of course, the Federal authority knew that it was they who had confined him inside Biafra, totally against his will. If the Gowon Government had released the whole lot of us detained by Ironsi, surely, Nzeogwu and the remainder of us would have returned to the places of our choice in Nigeria. Not one of us would have been involved in Biafra. (Adewale Ademoyega 201)


Now, I wonder why the Nigeria government then led by northern elite and soldiers would give a heroic burial to a man who A. M. Mainasara describes as a arch rebel and assassin in his book of refutations. The idea that the coup d'etat was only targeted at Northern leaders was mere propaganda in the hands of deceitful politicians to fuel the ethnic crises for their personal aggrandizement or to get hold of power. Yes, more northerners lost their lives in that unfortunate coup than any other group of people, but I also know that the premier of the then Western Region (Chief S. L. Akintola) and Finance minister, Chief Festus Okotie-Eboh also lost their lives in that coup, yet these were not northerners.

The crop of officers in the Nigerian army of those days were brewed from the barley of patriotism, they were uncommon soldiers and their kind is no more to be found in modern Nigeria. It is unfortunate, therefore, that A. M. Mainasara is still buying into the propaganda that led to the pogrom in the North, a counter coup and finally culminated in a Civil War and it is even more worrisome that this is coming many years after the execution of the first coup, when we should have been able to asses situations with a clear mind and an analytical approach to issues.

However we choose to see it, the fact remains that the British government introduced nepotism into the newly independent Nigerian government and they favored the north over other groups. Till date, the system is still not balanced and perhaps it is why we hear of agitations here and there, the latest being the demand for the sovereign state of Biafra.

If the coup was an Igbo coup as A. M. Mainasara seem to presume, how come it was still Igbo officers who frustrated it and arrested the perpetrators? If we are to go by Major Ademoyega's account, the roles played by Lieutenant-Colonel Odimegwu Ojukwu, Alex Madiebo, and General Aguyi Ironsi were instrumental to the unsuccessful completion of the coup.

Again I ask that if Nzeogwu had wanted power for himself and wanted northerners out of the political scene totally, would he have willingly accepted to function under a government headed by Aguyi Ironsi and handed over the reins of the Government of Northern Nigeria to Lieutenant-Colonel Hassan Katsina?

At the Brigade Headquarters, a short ceremony was staged. There was a parade. Nzeogwu took the salute and formerly handed over the reins of the Government of Northern Nigeria to Lieutenant-Colonel Hassan Katsina. It was a public ceremony. The press, the radio and the television were present, together with the world press. Hassan made a brief speech in praise of Nzeogwu. He lauded the selfishness of his fight and principles.

He also promised to stand by those principles and purpose for which Nzeogwu fought. After that, he embraced Nzeogwu and both of them parted as comrades-in-arms. Nzeogwu went from there to the airport and flew to Lagos. (Adewale Ademoyega 137-8)

Is it not then an irony that Lieutenant-Colonel Hassan Katsina (a northerner) emerged one of the major beneficiary of an Igbo coup?

Lastly, even it were Igbo officers (which is not even the case here for Adewale Ademoyega for example is not even an easterner, talk more of being Igbo) who conspired to run northern elite and politicians out of government, does it justify a reprisal attack, a counter coup, and the total annihilation and persecution of the Igbos in the north? While the coup plotters might have destabilised the north, we cannot but affirm that the greater damage had later been carried out by the northern elements. Historical records are always there for proper confirmation.

To A. M. Mainasara, the Hausa-Fulani has an advanced system of government when compared with other sections of the country and this might likely explain why they found favour with the British colonial administration:


Without doubt, the people (Hausa people) benefitted from the enlightened rulership of the Fulani and the reform of the social political institutions of the land. Meanwhile, the Igbos and other peoples in the South were leading a life of ignorance, indulging in all sorts of practices such as witchcraft, juju and cannibalism while the Northern peopled style of living was comparable to other peoples who are advanced to similar level. The conditions against macabre practiced and other acceptable rites performed out of a terror of the unknown or for material gain.

These pagan practices still occur in parts of the South as the story in the Daily Times of Wednesday 17th March, 1981 on the discovery of two near fresh human skulls at Murtala International Airport testified. [bracket mine] (A. M. Mainasara 20)


Wonderful! So A. M. Mainasara is in essence saying that the colonial administration finds it inconvenient handing power over to the "pagan South" due to the preponderance of pagan practices and lack of civilized ethos cum existence! Just wonderful! Yet, we know how civilized the north is, even in this new millennia. It would be foolish to enter into an argument of civility over an issue such as this, I would rather hands off! However, I wonder why Mainasara had no foresight to see that a statement such as the one above validates the idea that the political existence of Nigeria was manipulated by the British to favor the North?

A. M. Mainasara calls the officers who constitute the inner caucus of the coup plotters "An Igbo cast indeed, except for the presence of only one Yoruba officer" (23). Yet, that singular exception makes all the difference and invalidates the idea of the coup being strictly an Igbo coup. The writer also calls Aguyi Ironsi a true Nigerian yet he does not blame the northern officers for staging a coup that had him shamefully executed and betrayed by his trusted allies, the north! Mainasara would later assert that Aguyi Ironsi was spared in the first coup simply because he belongs to the Igbo tribe! Perhaps, he did not read Adewale Ademoyega account of how Aguyi Ironsi narrowly escaped Major Ifeajuna or did he purposely hide that fact in order to peddle false opinions and ethnic propaganda?

A. M. Mainasara goes about using uncouth language on others yet claims to be a part of the civilized northern society. Such language runs through his book of refutations. For men as Sir Abubakar Tafawa Balewa and Sir Ahmadu Bello, he has appellations as "great" and "noble" for them in his book but Nzeogwu and his co-conspirators can be no more than "assasins", "arch rebels", "murderers majors" etc. Who is Mainasara seeking to impress? After reading Mainasara book of refutations and Adewale Ademoyega's account, it becomes totally obvious that A. M. Mainasara is guilty of ethnocentrism and tribalism both in language and thoughts.

While I have much respect for Sir Ahmadu Bello, Sir Abubakar Tafawa Balewa and other notable great men killed in the first Nigerian coup d'etat, I also have great respect for the executors of the first Nigerian coup for their intention to pull Nigeria out of tribalism and nepotism. I believe both groups had noble intentions for this great country, it was only in approach that both groups differs.

However, what has happened has happened. Should we remain stagnant licking or nursing old wounds, there might never be progress. The need to look towards a great future is pertinent and beckons on us all to show responsibility towards such a cause. This is where I still favour Adewale Ademoyega over A. M. Mainasara. Ademoyega provides blueprints in his book that can move the country forward while Mainasara went about issuing threats and identifying rebels in his. His slanted version of history should be seen as nothing more than what it is, mere ethnic propaganda.

To end this essay, I end this essay with one of John Pepper Clark's poem titled "Seasons of Omen" to show the sentiments expressed by many Nigerians immediately after the January 15, 1966 coup was executed:

Seasons of Omens

When calabashes held petrol and men
    turned fagots in the streets
Then came the five hunters
When mansions and limousines made
    bonfires in sunset cites
Then came the five hunters
When clans were discovered that were not in tue book
    and cattle counted for heads of men
Then came the five hunters
When hoodlums took possession of police barracks
    in defiance of bullets
Then came the five hunters
When ministers legislated from bed and
    made high office the prize for failure
Then came the five hunters
When wads of notes were kept in infant skulls
    with full blessing of prelates
Then came the five hunters
When women grew heavy with ballot papers
    delivering the house entire to adulterers
Then came the five hunters
When a grand vizier in season of arson turned
    upon bandits in a far off place
Then came the five hunters
When men lost their teeth before they cut them
    to eat corn
Then came the five hunters
When a cabinet grew so broad the top gave way
    and trapped everyone therein
Then came the five hunters.


Works Cited

Adegboyega, Adewale. Why We Struck. Ibadan: Evans Brothers, 1981. Print.

Clark, J. P. "Season of Omens." Full Tide. Ibadan: Mosuro, 2010. Print.

Mainasara, A. M. The Five Majors - Why They Struck. Zaria: Hudahuda, 1982. Print.

Vanguard. "Northern Youths write Osinbajo, beg him to allow Igbo go with Biafra". https://www.vanguardngr.com/2017/06/northern-youths-write-osinbajo-beg-allow-igbo-go-biafra/. Ret. Sept. 17, 2017.

© Ubaji Isiaka Abubakar Eazy 2017


Meet the Reviewer


Ubaji Isiaka Abubakar Eazy is a literary critic cum reviewer, poet, and writer. 

Wednesday 30 August 2017

Womanism in African Literature: The Example of Flora Nwapa's Women are Different by Ubaji Isiaka Abubakar Eazy

WOMANISM IN AFRICAN LITERATURE: THE EXAMPLE OF FLORA NWAPA'S WOMEN ARE DIFFERENT

Ubaji Isiaka Abubakar Eazy

INTRODUCTION

How do you begin speaking of African female writers without mentioning Flora Nwapa? That woman led the way for other African female writers whose bloom came after hers. I mean writers as Buchi Emecheta, Tess Onwueme, Zulu Sofala, Mabel Segun, Nawal El Sadawi, Aminata Sow Fall, Mariama Ba, Zaynab Alkali, Akachi Ezeigbo, Ifeoma Okoye, Tsi Tsi Dangaremba, Alifa Rifaat, Bessie Head, Nadine Gordimer, and of course Ama Ata Aidoo (in no particular order). These women are the doyen of African female writings yet Flora Nwapa is a pioneer figure amongst them. These writers kick started the depiction of the feminist ideology in African literature. An ideology which younger ones as Chimamanda Ngozi Adichie, Chika Unigwe, Amma Darko, Grace Akpan, Ehigiator Dumebi Ezar, and Maryam Bongel have kept its fire burning bright.

In an essay titled "A House Divided: feminism in African literature," Charles Nnolim, a revered critic of African literature, identifies five various camps of African female writers:

a. Womanists
b. Accomodationists
c. Reactionaries and Middle-of-the-Roaders
d. Gyandrists
e. Feminists

I shall provide brief explanation on the five groups.

Womanism is a black centered ideology whose link to feminism is the freedom and independence of black women but differs from radical feminism in its search for reasonable unification between black women, men, and children. Its focus is to ensure that men change their sexist stand. Its practitioners (womanists) do not end the plots of their novels with feminist victories. Flora Nwapa, Mariama Ba, Ifeoma Okoye, and Zaynab Alkali belong to this school of writers.

Accomodationists do not advocate total equality with men for even while asking for some measures of equality, they concede leadership roles to men and do not struggle to lead the home. Accomodationists stress reconciliation, convergence, affection, and love. Accomodationists have similar ideas as the womanists hence its writers overlap. Mariama Ba belongs to this group.

The Reactionaries and middle of the roaders do not join the feminist trend or declaim it even though they are often found praising their husbands for nurturing and raising them with tender loving care, a perspective which core feminists regard as an embarrassing self abasement. Zulu Sofala belongs to this camp.

Gyandrists refer to those male writers who either promote the feminist ideology or are praised by feminist critics for belonging to the feminist camp. Here you have Sembene Ousmane, Isidore Okpewho, Daniel Mengara and of course Ngugi wa Thiong'o.

Nnolim says the African feminist writers are Janus faced because even though the claim not to be of feminists in public, their works exhibit heavy influence of the feminist ideology. Buchi Emecheta and Flora Nwapa are examples of writers in this group.

It is however the first camp (womanism) which Flora Nwapa belongs that we wish to examine here using her novel Women are Different.

THE STORY

So, Flora Nwapa's novel (Women are Different) tells the story of four women from their teenage years at a girls high school down to their adult lives as married women and mothers. These four friends (Agnes, Rose, Dora, and Comfort) had set out to make a difference in the world which they perceive as largely paternalistic and are determined to make that difference. The privilege and exposure of an education under the tutelage of female European missionaries helped to boost self esteem and their need to become important people in the society. So, after school they set out on different paths.

Agnes got married immediately after school to a man old enough to be her father; with her step mother mounting pressure on the father to approve the marriage. This man had wanted to marry Agnes at a much younger age but Agnes' father insisted on following his late wife's wish that Agnes be educated in high school. Her suitor took care of her school fees from primary to secondary school, visits her at school with gifts and patiently waited for her to be through with her education before he would finally claim her for himself.

Agnes was clearly not for this plan, being a bright student, she had lofty dreams and she was determined that nothing would stop her from attaining her dreams, not even marriage. She passed her exams in flying colours and after four children, she decides to pursue her education against her husband's wish. She won the battle when her father intervened and talked sense to the husband who then gave his consent.

Agnes enrolled at the university for evening classes where she met and fell in love with her lecturer, Mr Ayo Dele. The result was that her marriage fell apart and she moved in with Ayo Dele who is old enough to be her grand father. Ayo Dele being a gentle man takes care of her kids while she attends classes and he encourages her to further her education to the master's level. Agnes father; on receiving the news of what Agnes did to her husband; felt heartbroken and died as a result of the shame.

Although Ayo Dele later dies, Agnes would go on to become a highly placed civil servant (after the departure of the British; in the days immediately after independence), she would also become an executive of a private firm and live a comfortable life.

After school, Dora (another of the young women) trained to become a nurse and later married Chris, her boyfriend from the boys' grammar school. Chris worked as a court clerk after school and was fond of corrupt practices such as taking bribes.

Dora worked as a nurse till she had her fifth child and decided to branch out into bakery business. She made much success that she was able to fund her husband's extravagant and ostentatious lifestyle and assist him to build a house in his hometown.

However, Chris began having problems at work because of his brusque attitude towards his colleagues and he was forced to apply for a leave of absence without pay. He told his wife that his intention was to travel abroad to further his education. He secretly sold off the house his wife helped to build and travelled overseas.

Chris would abandon his family for many years, even as the Nigeria-Biafra Civil War came and went by. Luckily, Dora is a shrewd woman and her business acumen would make her survive through the period of the war with her kids. She would also make a lot of money from her business, acquire property, and emerge from the civil war unscathed, and a richer woman. She goes seeking her husband abroad but finds out he has forgotten his family and now lives under the care of a woman in Germany.

Rose, the third young lady, acquires a Diploma in Education from the University of London and becomes a Woman Education Officer in Queen's college, where she taught Mathematics. She would be jilted by Mark, would tighten her girdle and decide to forge ahead irrespective of the disappointment and challenges she had to live through. She later gets a job with a public relations firm and she lives comfortably. Rose becomes wealthy but she yearns for things she was never lucky to get; a stable relationship, children, or marriage; and she felt unfortunate that none of these things ever happened to her. She remains a spinster while her friends already had grown up kids of 20 years.

Comfort also trained as a nurse and ended up marrying a rich man who took good care of her.

Now, while these four women toiled to attain the position they arrived at in life, they failed to pass a good legacy to their children. Dora first daughter, Chinwe would not want to be educated as her mother, she wanted to be part of the business world as her mother. Albeit she was a successful business woman and married a well to do man, she abandoned her husband when he choose to bring into their home a younger lady as a second wife. Chinwe would later become the paramour to a rich old man with wife and children in his house. The man buys her a house and she is happy. Comfort (her mother's friend) would even say that she has the right to be different, that the younger generation of women are bold and should be allowed to make their own decisions and mistakes, rather than being tied up and having to depend on the men in their lives.

If Dora's daughter became a wayward woman, Agnes' daughter (Zizi) did not turn out any better. At eighteen she runs away from home to live in a brothel where she ends up as a lady of the night. Her mother's attempt at forcing her back home was rebuffed as she accuses her mother of not being a better woman for she abandoned their father to live with her lover while her children were yet young. This would cause Agnes to go seeking her now very old husband and bring him out of his poverty to live with her. She takes care of him and provides for his needs. Yet Zizi had become too wild to be tamed, she would get involved in narcotics and be arrested at the airport in London. After she has been freed due largely to her mother's effort, she marries within one week and get divorced the following week.

Dora's husband (Chris) returns to Nigeria and Dora welcomes him as if nothing happened. She is happy to have her husband and marriage back because she fears living the life of single woman without a father for her children. She introduces Rose (who had never been lucky in her past relationship with men) to Olu (who had been her lover while her husband was away) and she hopes Rose and Olu will be a perfect match for each other.

MY VIEWS

First, I must say that I love the style employed in narrating the story even though it is set down in a chronological order. The writer brought the girls together as friends in high school, then after high school, we delved into the lives of the ladies (who had become young women) individually, a chapter each was sacrificed to narrating what transpired in the lives of these women after their secondary school days; except Comfort who did not get much coverage. Then towards the end, the novelist links their stories together and creates some sort of unification.

Now, in line with the womanist perspective, this novel clearly does not end with feminist victory. The novel emphasizes the completeness of the family whereas a family is not made of just the mother and children alone, a father has to be in the picture for the man's position in the household cannot be obliterated. This is why Dora would gladly have her husband back without having to quarrel, even though he had longed abandoned his family, why Agnes would go bring back a man she abandoned years back in pursuit of her dreams, and why Rose feels unfulfilled without a man in her life (even though she is wealthy and quite comfortable). Flora Nwapa seems to advocate for the unity of the family and sees it as non-negotiable. Nonetheless, the novel has proved to us that women also have needs that seeks gratification and the society must work towards providing avenues for them to satiate their needs. The female child education must therefore be taken seriously, early marriage should be abolished, women are partners in a relationship and not subordinate, and should be taken seriously and consulted before decisions are taken. Flora Nwapa (using this novel) makes a loud statement on issues facing African women and we are glad to be enlightened. Yet, I do have my objections on her novel, especially with its characterisation and her love for scandalous heroines.

I strongly believe that literature is about life and when people read books, they are influenced by what they read, either consciously or subconsciously. This is what most feminist writers fail to comprehend; or are they just pretending not to know this? For if they claim to be unaware of the powerful influence of literature on a reader's perception of life and reasoning, the purpose of writing feminist stories, in the first instance, would have been defeated.

I seem to remember that one of the bashful comments by feminists critics on Cyprian Ekwensi's Jagua Nana is that he projects women in a bad light, showing them as prostitutes and rogues. If Cyprian Ekwensi is being put down for such depiction, why should feminist writers continue to project such image of women? Is it only wrong when a male writer depicts female characters in this light but accepted if the writer is a woman?

In Nwapa's Women are Different, the manner in which the female characters attained their "dignified" status is wrong! To use the right word, it is immoral and I wonder what these writers teach their female readers. Women empowerment can be attained, yes, but it should not be through prostitution and immoral acts. In the novel, Agnes abandons her husband in a bid to get higher education and she ends up with an older man old enough to be her grandfather even though she claims to find some difficultly in accepting her husband after four children. Her brazen act resulted in her father's untimely death! Are we still wondering why her daughter ran away from home at the age of 18 to become a lady of the night?

What about Rose, she bumbles from one relationship to the other and would befriend a man even though she  knows quite well that the man is married with children.

Comfort is so saintly that she advises Chinwe to abandon her husband and go ahead to enjoy her life with a man capable of providing for her needs, what I would never understand is that, Chinwe left her husband because he choose to take a second wife only to become the paramour of a much older man who is already married. It is the same scenario with Agnes who abandons her husband and moves into the apartment of her old lecturer with five kids. She complains that her husband is old yet she choose a lover older than her father and old enough to be a grand father to her. While I am not in support of child marriage, we should not fail to also consider the fact that the man Agnes deserted sponsored her through primary and secondary school and was responsible for her upkeep. He loves her and never maltreated her yet she could just decide to abandon a man she had four children for to go stay with a much older lover.

Agnes is particularly inconsiderate and selfish because she abandons her husband and the father of her four children while the children were still young without considering the psychological effect of her attitude on the children and this is definitely the reason why Zizi takes to prostitution and becomes bitter with her mother. Agnes also did not think that her actions would lead to her father's demise and she remains unrepentant even after his death. Clearly, she was determined to pursue her own happiness irrespective of whose ox is gored. Such an existential existence is dangerous for the human society.

If the generation of the four women lived well, their children (Chinwe and Zizi) are wild and are hardly any example to go by and it is a great failure on their part as parents.

Women can attain greatness in the society but I do not think the only route towards such greatness should be one strewn with scandals and disregard for cultural and societal norms. Feminist writers should write us stories of women who attained greatness but with less immorality and respect for society. We would not want our mothers, sisters, and wives who read these works to assume that women can only make impact in the society by living an amorous lifestyle.

However, I think the character of Dora stands out amongst the others in the novel for her entrepreneurial skills, her ability to forgive her husband and accept him back to her life after years of being deserted, and her knack her survival; as well as that of her family; during a horrendous civil war that ravaged the country for almost three years, even though she could not stand her ground and insist that her daughter should never compromise her moral principles.

Another issue I have with the novel is the portrayal of men in the story, the men were just never good enough! As if the feminist agenda is to demonize men in their works! Agnes' husband is a doting husband who loves his wife so much but the writer found a blemish for him; he is having an amorous relationship with Agnes' stepmother and Agnes had to catch them red handed to give her an excuse for deserting the man. Chris (Dora's husband) grows up to become a bribe eater and an irresponsible fellow, he lives an ostentatious lifestyle at the expense of his wife and would abandon his family for an European lady in Germany. Ernest, who was formerly Rose's lover, also grows up to become a criminal and hard drug peddler who is always having problems with law officials. Mark, Rose's husband, jilts her, and the next man she meets again happens to be  a married man running after unmarried young ladies. Olu, might be a better man from the rest but he seems to be having psychological problems too! Then, Chinwe's husband had to go get a second wife to save face in the society (he did not want to be that big man chief in his community who could not get a second wife). I cannot be angry with him because he also, like most women, is a victim of society. He wanted to live up to the status society arrogated to him. And maybe in the actual sense, we all are victims of society.

Lastly, I must say that the womanist writers have me confused in no little way. Well, I can understand the core feminist whose wish is to debunk patriarchy in all ramifications while striving for equality but I have never been able to ferret these womanist writers who seek to make men change their sexist stance yet encourage patriarchy. In Women are Different, the role of the man as the leader and father in the home is still emphasized, and also, the fact that a woman is unfulfilled without a husband is still foregrounded as exemplified in Rose continual search for a man to marry, and also evident in the reunification of Agnes and Dora with their husbands. So I am left wondering where this brand of feminism is headed if it cannot divorce itself from the same things it preaches against.

CONCLUSION

For me, I think a world without women would be unlivable as a world without men would mostly likely be the same. I have never believed in the equality of the sexes and still do not till date. But I think that men and women are not equal because they were they never meant to compete. They are meant to complement each other, a man completes a woman as a woman completes a man for what a man does not have should be found with the woman so both must work together to create a better society.

Flora Nwapa is classified as a womanist by Charles Nnolim (a critic of African literature) and we have tested this ideology on her novel, Women are Different, to see how it aids our understanding of the work. Above all, I am glad that the African feminists, even in their campaign for gender equality, understand the need for a complete family setting rather than one of single parenthood. I am glad that they understand forgiveness, and preach unification instead of separation or divorce. I only hope that the younger generations of African feminists would study and take a leaf out of the books of old female writers as Flora Nwapa.

© Ubaji Isiaka Abubakar Eazy 2017

WORKS CITED

Ekwensi, Cyprian. Jagua Nana. London: Panther, 1963. Print.

Flora, Nwapa. Women are Different. Enugu: Tana Press, 1990. Print.

Nnolim, Charles E. Issues in African Literature. Lagos: Malthouse, 2010. Print.

MEET THE CRITIC


Ubaji Isiaka Abubakar Eazy is a literary critic, poet, literary reviewer, short story writer, poet, and copy editor. He is the Chief Editor at literarycriticsandwriters.simdif.com